logologo

  • Home
  • Products and Services
    • Crop Booster
    • Bio Booster
    • Yield Max Program
    • Book Pre-Sale Portal
  • Results
  • The Science
    • TRL9
    • Science Documents
    • Science Documents (Spanish)
  • About Us
    • Certifications and Awards Page
    • Our Blog
    • Harvest Harmonics Video Gallery
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
    • Booking
    • We Are Hiring
    • Internships
  • Cart
logologo

  • Home
  • Products and Services
    • Crop Booster
    • Bio Booster
    • Yield Max Program
    • Book Pre-Sale Portal
  • Results
  • The Science
    • TRL9
    • Science Documents
    • Science Documents (Spanish)
  • About Us
    • Certifications and Awards Page
    • Our Blog
    • Harvest Harmonics Video Gallery
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
    • Booking
    • We Are Hiring
    • Internships
  • Cart
  • Home
  • Products and Services
    • Crop Booster
    • Bio Booster
    • Yield Max Program
    • Book Pre-Sale Portal
  • Results
  • The Science
    • TRL9
    • Science Documents
    • Science Documents (Spanish)
  • About Us
    • Certifications and Awards Page
    • Our Blog
    • Harvest Harmonics Video Gallery
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
    • Booking
    • We Are Hiring
    • Internships
  • Cart

Peppers

Home / Case Studies / Bell Pepper — Odisha, India
University Field Trial · Bell Pepper · Odisha, India · 2025

62% Higher Bell Pepper Fruit Weight With 23% Taller Plants

At Centurion University's experimental field in Jhola, Odisha, bell peppers grown with Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ were compared with a control under drip irrigation and a polythene mulch system. Preliminary measurements reported 62% higher fruit weight, 23% greater plant height, and 14% greater fruit circumference.

+62%
Fruit Weight vs. Control
+23% Plant Height
Source-Reported Difference vs. Control
Date
2025
Location
Jhola, Odisha, India
Institution
Centurion University Experimental Field
Crop
Bell Pepper
Irrigation
Drip Irrigation
Field Setup
Polythene Mulch System
Comparison
Crop Booster vs. Control
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Trial Context The supplied preliminary results report percentage differences between Crop Booster and control plants across growth, fruit, vegetation-index, chlorophyll, and canopy-temperature measurements.
Bell pepper trial at Centurion University experimental field in Jhola Odisha India
Bell Pepper Trial · Centurion University · Jhola, Odisha · 2025
Preliminary Measured Results

Higher fruit weight, plant height, fruit circumference, NDVI, and SPAD were reported in the treated group.

The preliminary comparison reports the largest difference in fruit weight at +62%. Plant height measured +23%, fruit circumference +14%, GreenSeeker/NDVI +12.5%, SPAD +9%, number of fruits per plant +3.4%, and canopy temperature +7.2% relative to the control.

+62%
Fruit Weight
Largest source-reported difference in the preliminary dataset.
+23%
Plant Height
Source-reported difference compared with the control.
+14%
Fruit Circumference
Treated fruit circumference was reported 14% above control.
+12.5%
GreenSeeker / NDVI
Vegetation-index measurement reported above control.
+9%
SPAD
Leaf chlorophyll index reported 9% above control.
+3.4%
Fruits Per Plant
Number of fruits per plant was reported 3.4% above control.
+7.2%
Canopy Temperature
Reported measurement difference; physiological significance is not defined in the source.

Fruit Development

Fruit weight showed the largest reported difference at +62%, while fruit circumference was reported +14% compared with control.

Plant Development

Plant height was reported 23% higher and the number of fruits per plant 3.4% higher in the treated group.

Vegetation Index

GreenSeeker/NDVI was reported 12.5% higher in the Crop Booster treatment.

SPAD Measurement

The SPAD chlorophyll index was reported 9% higher than the control.

Measurement Control Crop Booster Reported Difference
Fruit Weight Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +62%
Plant Height Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +23%
Fruit Circumference Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +14%
GreenSeeker / NDVI Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +12.5%
SPAD Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +9%
Fruits Per Plant Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +3.4%
Canopy Temperature Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +7.2% Measurement Difference
Institution: Centurion University Experimental Field
Location: Jhola, Odisha, Eastern India  ·  Date: 2025
Crop: Bell Pepper
Irrigation: Drip Irrigation
Field Setup: Polythene Mulch System
Fruit Weight: +62%
Plant Height: +23%
Fruit Circumference: +14%
GreenSeeker / NDVI: +12.5%
SPAD: +9%
Canopy Temperature: +7.2%
Number of Fruits Per Plant: +3.4%
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The supplied case describes these figures as preliminary measured results comparing Crop Booster with a control. Percentage differences are provided, but the underlying treated and control values are not supplied, so the percentages cannot be independently recalculated. Fruit weight showed the largest reported difference at +62%, followed by plant height at +23% and fruit circumference at +14%. GreenSeeker/NDVI and SPAD are reported as +12.5% and +9% respectively. The +7.2% canopy-temperature figure is preserved as a measurement difference but is not labeled an improvement, because raw temperatures, measurement timing, environmental conditions, and physiological interpretation are not supplied. No total harvested yield, yield per hectare, individual fruit weights, raw fruit counts, Brix, irrigation volumes, fertilizer-use differences, pesticide-use differences, production costs, or economic-return data were supplied.

Why this matters for bell pepper growers: This Centurion University preliminary comparison reports differences across both fruit and plant development. The largest result was 62% higher fruit weight, accompanied by 23% greater plant height, 14% greater fruit circumference, and higher GreenSeeker/NDVI and SPAD measurements.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your bell pepper or vegetable operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Bell Pepper — Odisha, India
University Field Trial · Bell Pepper · Odisha, India · March 2025

37% Heavier Bell Pepper Fruit With 15.6% Higher Yield Per Plant

At Centurion University's experimental field in Jhola, Odisha, two adjacent bell pepper fields were compared under drip irrigation and polythene mulch. Both received equal inputs, while the test field was irrigated with Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ water. Treated fruit averaged 95.4 g compared with 69.6 g in the control, while yield per plant reached 1,546.8 g compared with 1,337.6 g.

+37%
Fruit Weight vs. Control
+15.6% Yield / Plant
1,546.8 g vs. 1,337.6 g
Date
March 2025
Location
Jhola, Odisha, India
Institution
Centurion University Experimental Field
Crop
Bell Pepper
Irrigation
Drip Irrigation
Setup
Polythene Mulch System
Comparison
Two Adjacent Fields
Inputs
Both Fields Treated Equally
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Trial Context The test field was irrigated with Crop Booster water, while the adjacent control field received standard water. The source states that other inputs were applied equally to both fields.
Bell pepper field trial at Centurion University in Jhola Odisha India comparing Crop Booster and control
Bell Pepper Field Trial · Centurion University · Jhola, Odisha · March 2025
Measured Results

Heavier fruit, higher yield per plant, more fruit per plant, and larger measured fruit dimensions.

Crop Booster fruit averaged 95.4 g compared with 69.6 g in the control, approximately 37% heavier. Total yield per plant measured 1,546.8 g compared with 1,337.6 g, a 15.6% increase. Treated plants also produced more fruits per plant and larger fruit circumference and length.

+37%
Fruit Weight
95.4 g with Crop Booster vs. 69.6 g in the control.
+15.6%
Yield Per Plant
1,546.8 g/plant vs. 1,337.6 g/plant in the control.
+17.2%
Fruit Circumference
22.5 cm with Crop Booster vs. 19.2 cm control.
+10.2%
Fruits Per Plant
9.70 fruits per plant vs. 8.80 in the control.
+8.7%
Fruit Length
11.2 cm compared with 10.3 cm in the control.
+31%
Aroma Score
Sensory evaluation: 8.9/10 vs. 6.8/10.
+21%
Luster Score
Sensory evaluation: 8.7/10 vs. 7.2/10.

Heavier Fruit

Individual fruit weight averaged 95.4 g in the Crop Booster treatment compared with 69.6 g in the control.

Higher Yield Per Plant

Total yield reached 1,546.8 g per plant compared with 1,337.6 g per plant in the control.

More & Larger Fruit

Treated plants averaged 9.70 fruits per plant, with fruit circumference reaching 22.5 cm and fruit length reaching 11.2 cm.

Sensory Evaluation

Aroma was scored 8.9/10 vs. 6.8/10 and luster 8.7/10 vs. 7.2/10 in the supplied sensory evaluation.

Measurement Control Crop Booster Difference
Fruit Weight 69.6 g 95.4 g +37%
Total Yield / Plant 1,337.6 g 1,546.8 g +15.6%
Fruits / Plant 8.80 9.70 +10.2%
Fruit Circumference 19.2 cm 22.5 cm +17.2%
Fruit Length 10.3 cm 11.2 cm +8.7%
Aroma · Sensory Score 6.8 / 10 8.9 / 10 +31%
Luster · Sensory Score 7.2 / 10 8.7 / 10 +21%
Harvest Cuttings / Season Raw Value Not Supplied Raw Value Not Supplied +9.1% · Source Reported
Institution: Centurion University Experimental Field
Location: Jhola, Odisha, Eastern India  ·  Date: March 2025
Crop: Bell Pepper
Irrigation: Drip Irrigation
Setup: Polythene Mulch System
Fruit Weight: 95.4 g vs. 69.6 g · +37%
Total Yield / Plant: 1,546.8 g vs. 1,337.6 g · +15.6%
Fruits / Plant: 9.70 vs. 8.80 · +10.2%
Fruit Circumference: 22.5 cm vs. 19.2 cm · +17.2%
Fruit Length: 11.2 cm vs. 10.3 cm · +8.7%
Aroma Score: 8.9 / 10 vs. 6.8 / 10 · +31%
Luster Score: 8.7 / 10 vs. 7.2 / 10 · +21%
Harvest Cuttings: +9.1% · Source Reported
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The supplied raw measurements support the reported differences for fruit weight, yield per plant, fruits per plant, fruit circumference, fruit length, aroma, and luster. Fruit weight increased from 69.6 g to 95.4 g, approximately +37.1%, while yield per plant increased from 1,337.6 g to 1,546.8 g, approximately +15.6%. The old case-study title and closing narrative refer to a 10.2% increase in plant height or plants being “10.2% taller,” but the supplied measurement table assigns 10.2% to the number of fruits per plant, 9.70 versus 8.80. No plant-height values are supplied, so no plant-height claim is made on this version of the page. The source also states that the treated crop produced 9.1% more harvest cuttings per season, but the raw treated and control cutting counts are not supplied, so that result remains source-reported only. Aroma and luster are sensory scores rather than laboratory composition measurements. No yield-per-hectare, Brix, SPAD, NDVI, irrigation-volume, fertilizer-use, pesticide-use, production-cost, or economic-return data were supplied.

Why this matters for bell pepper growers: This adjacent-field comparison documents measurable differences in both production and fruit characteristics. Crop Booster peppers were 37% heavier and produced 15.6% more yield per plant, while also recording more fruits per plant, larger fruit dimensions, and higher aroma and luster scores in the supplied evaluation.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your bell pepper or vegetable operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Chile Habanero — Colombia
Pepper Field Case · Valle del Cauca, Colombia · June 2021

More and Larger Habanero Peppers Reported During the Ninth Month of Growth

In Valle del Cauca, Colombia, Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ technology was introduced during the ninth month and final growth stage of a Chile Habanero pepper crop. The producer reported renewed vegetative growth, a greater quantity of peppers than the control, larger fruit, reduced fruit drop and cracking, and improved post-harvest shelf life.

9thMonth
Crop Booster Introduced During the Final Growth Stage
More & Larger Fruit
Producer-Reported vs. Control
Date
June 2021
Location
Valle del Cauca, Colombia
Crop
Chile Habanero Pepper
Growth Stage
Ninth Month · Final Stage
Comparison
KPCB-Treated Plants vs. Control Plants
Result Type
Producer-Reported Field Observations
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Case Context The technology was introduced late in the crop cycle. According to the producer, the normal historical pattern at this stage was declining fruit size and lower production.
Chile Habanero pepper crop in Valle del Cauca Colombia using Kyminasi Plants Crop Booster
Chile Habanero Pepper Case · Valle del Cauca, Colombia · June 2021
Producer-Reported Results

Renewed vigor, more fruit, larger peppers, less crop damage, and improved post-harvest consistency were observed.

After Crop Booster use began, the producer described brighter green leaves and prolific new shoot growth. Despite the crop being in its final growth stage, treated plants were reported to produce more peppers than the control and fruit larger than the producer had previously observed at this stage.

Renewed Plant Vigor

The producer reported brighter green leaves and prolific development of new shoots after KPCB use began.

Greater Fruit Quantity

KPCB-treated plants were reported to produce a greater quantity of peppers than the control plants during the late growth stage.

Larger Late-Stage Fruit

The producer reported peppers larger than previously observed during this stage of the production cycle.

Reduced Agrichemical Need

The need for agrichemical applications used to manage rust and mites was reported as reduced after KPCB use.

Less Fruit Drop & Cracking

The producer observed less fruit drop and less fruit cracking compared with the control crop.

Improved Shelf Life

Improved pepper shelf life and greater consistency during post-harvest storage were reported relative to the control.

Result Area Control / Historical Context KPCB Observation Evidence Type
Plant Vigor Late-Stage Crop Brighter Leaves & Prolific New Shoots Producer Observation
Fruit Quantity Control Plants Greater Quantity of Peppers Qualitative Comparison
Fruit Size Historically Declined at This Stage Larger Fruit Reported Producer Observation
Agrichemical Applications Used for Rust & Mite Management Reduced Need Reported No Application Rate Supplied
Fruit Drop Control Crop Less Fruit Drop Qualitative Comparison
Fruit Cracking Control Crop Less Cracking Qualitative Comparison
Shelf Life Control Crop Improved Shelf Life Storage Duration Not Supplied
Post-Harvest Storage Control Crop Greater Storage Consistency Producer Observation
Location: Valle del Cauca, Colombia  ·  Date: June 2021
Crop: Chile Habanero Pepper
Technology Introduction: Ninth Month · Final Growth Stage
Plant Vigor: Brighter Green Leaves & Prolific New Shoots · Source Reported
Fruit Quantity: Greater Than Control · Source Reported
Fruit Size: Larger Than Previously Observed at Late Stage · Source Reported
Agrichemical Need: Reduced for Rust & Mite Control · Source Reported
Fruit Drop: Less Than Control · Source Reported
Fruit Cracking: Less Than Control · Source Reported
Shelf Life: Improved vs. Control · Source Reported
Post-Harvest Storage: Greater Consistency · Source Reported
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

This case is based primarily on producer-reported field observations rather than numerical measurement data. The source states that the KPCB-treated plants produced more peppers than the control and larger fruit during the ninth month of growth, but no fruit counts, individual fruit weights, dimensions, total yield, or yield-per-area measurements are supplied. Agrichemical applications for rust and mites were reportedly reduced, but no product names, application rates, number of treatments, costs, or percentage reductions are provided. Less fruit drop and cracking are reported qualitatively without incidence counts. Improved shelf life and post-harvest consistency are also reported without storage-day measurements, temperature conditions, spoilage rates, firmness measurements, or weight-loss data. Brighter green foliage is a visual observation and is not presented as a measured increase in chlorophyll, SPAD, NDVI, or photosynthesis.

Why this matters for pepper growers: This Valle del Cauca case is notable because Crop Booster was introduced during the crop's ninth month, when the producer historically expected declining fruit size and production. Instead, the producer reported renewed vegetative growth, more and larger peppers, less fruit drop and cracking, reduced need for rust and mite treatments, and improved post-harvest performance.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your pepper or vegetable operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Paprika — Colombia
Greenhouse Case Study · Paprika · Colombia · 2021

100% Higher First-Harvest Paprika Yield With No Agrichemicals Needed

In Valle del Cauca, Colombia, Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ technology was installed in a paprika greenhouse. First-harvest production reached 2 kg per plant compared with 1 kg per plant in the control. The source also reports that no agrichemicals were needed in the KPCB crop.

+100%
First-Harvest Yield vs. Control
No Agrichemicals Needed
Source-Reported KPCB Crop Management
Date
January 2021
Season
Summer
Location
Valle del Cauca, Colombia
Crop
Paprika
Setting
Greenhouse
Control Yield
1 kg Per Plant · First Harvest
KPCB Yield
2 kg Per Plant · First Harvest
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Comparison Context The supplied comparison table identifies 1 kg per plant as the control first-harvest yield and 2 kg per plant as the KPCB first-harvest yield.
Paprika greenhouse case study in Valle del Cauca Colombia using Kyminasi Plants Crop Booster
Paprika Greenhouse Case Study · Valle del Cauca, Colombia · January 2021
Reported Results

First-harvest production doubled from 1 kg to 2 kg per plant.

The KPCB paprika crop produced 2 kg per plant on the first harvest compared with 1 kg per plant in the control. This represents a direct 100% increase in first-harvest production. The source also reports no observed pests or diseases and no need for agrichemical applications in the treated crop.

2kg/plant
KPCB First Harvest
Compared with 1 kg per plant in the control.
+100%
First-Harvest Yield
Direct comparison of 2 kg per plant vs. 1 kg per plant.
17years
Agrichemical History
First time in 17 years agrichemicals were reportedly not needed on that field.

Double the First-Harvest Yield

The treated crop produced 2 kg per plant compared with 1 kg per plant in the control.

No Agrichemicals Needed

The source states that agrichemical applications were not needed on the KPCB crop.

No Pests Observed

The treated crop was reported as having no observed pest presence during the documented case.

No Diseases Observed

The source also reports no disease presence in the KPCB paprika crop.

Measurement Control KPCB Result
First-Harvest Production 1 kg / Plant 2 kg / Plant +100%
Agrichemicals Needed Yes None Source-Reported
Pest Presence Control Count Not Supplied None Observed Qualitative Observation
Disease Presence Control Count Not Supplied None Observed Qualitative Observation
Location: Valle del Cauca, Colombia  ·  Date: January 2021
Season: Summer
Crop: Paprika
Setting: Greenhouse
Control First-Harvest Yield: 1 kg Per Plant
KPCB First-Harvest Yield: 2 kg Per Plant
Calculated Yield Difference: +100%
Agrichemicals Needed: None · Source Reported
Pests Observed: None · Source Reported
Diseases Observed: None · Source Reported
Historical Context: First Time in 17 Years Agrichemicals Were Reportedly Not Needed
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The supplied comparison table explicitly identifies first-harvest production of 1 kg per plant in the control and 2 kg per plant with KPCB. This supports a direct calculated increase of 100% for the first harvest. The source also states that agrichemicals were needed in the control but none were needed in the KPCB crop, and that this was the first time in 17 years agrichemicals were reportedly unnecessary on that field. However, the historical agrichemical products, application quantities, treatment frequency, and costs are not supplied. Therefore, this page describes the treated crop as requiring no agrichemicals rather than claiming a quantified 100% reduction in agrichemical use. No pest counts, disease-incidence percentages, full-season yield, yield per hectare, fruit-size data, Brix, irrigation volumes, fertilizer-use data, production costs, or economic-return measurements were supplied.

Why this matters for paprika growers: This Valle del Cauca greenhouse comparison documents first-harvest production of 2 kg per plant with Crop Booster compared with 1 kg per plant in the control, representing a 100% increase. The source also reports no agrichemicals were needed on the treated crop and no pests or diseases were observed.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your paprika, pepper, or greenhouse operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Bell Peppers — Panama
Greenhouse Case Study · Bell Peppers · Panama · Spring 2015

70% More Pepper Production by Weight With 10–14 Days Slower Decomposition

At Pepper King Farms in Bajo Boquete, Panama, Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ technology was installed in one greenhouse and compared with the farm's other pepper greenhouses. The KPCB greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by weight, while treated peppers averaged 20–30% larger than control specimens.

+70%
Pepper Production by Weight vs. Control Greenhouses
10–14 Days
Slower Decomposition in Shelf-Life Test
Date
Spring 2015
Location
Bajo Boquete, Panama
Farm
Pepper King Farms
Owner
Ariel Flores
Crop
Bell Peppers & Pepper Varieties
Setting
Greenhouse
Comparison
KPCB Greenhouse vs. Other Farm Greenhouses
Farm History
Greenhouse Production Since 2011
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Case Context The farm installed Crop Booster technology in one greenhouse and compared its performance with the farm's other pepper greenhouses during the same production operation.
Pepper King Farms greenhouse pepper case study in Bajo Boquete Panama
Pepper King Farms · Bajo Boquete, Panama · Spring 2015
Reported Results

Higher production by weight, larger peppers, slower decomposition, and longer plant survival during a disease event.

The KPCB greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by weight than the comparison greenhouses. Individual peppers were described as averaging approximately 20–30% larger. In a separate 30-day shelf-life comparison, treated peppers decomposed 10–14 days later than control specimens.

+70%
Production by Weight
Source-reported result compared with the farm's control greenhouses.
+20–30%
Average Pepper Size
Treated peppers were reported larger than control specimens.
10–14days
Slower Decomposition
Reported difference during a 30-day shelf-life comparison.
+3weeks
Plant Survival
KPCB plants reportedly survived about three weeks beyond the control plants during a disease outbreak.

Higher Production by Weight

The Crop Booster greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by total weight than the farm's comparison greenhouses.

Larger Peppers

Treated peppers were described as averaging approximately 20–30% larger than control specimens.

Shelf-Life Comparison

During a 30-day shelf test, the KPCB peppers were reported to decompose 10–14 days later than comparable control peppers.

Disease-Outbreak Survival

During a late-season disease outbreak, the control plants reportedly died within one week, while KPCB plants survived for about three additional weeks before also succumbing.

Result Area Control / Comparison KPCB Reported Difference
Pepper Production by Weight Comparison Greenhouses Higher Production +70%
Pepper Size Control Specimens Larger Peppers +20–30% · Source Reported
Shelf-Life Test Normal Control Decomposition Slower Decomposition 10–14 Days Later
Shelf-Life Test Duration 30 Days 30 Days Same Observation Period
Survival During Disease Outbreak All Control Plants Reportedly Dead Within 1 Week Survived About 3 Additional Weeks Field Observation
Farm: Pepper King Farms
Owner: Ariel Flores
Location: Bajo Boquete, Panama  ·  Date: Spring 2015
Crop: Bell Peppers & Pepper Varieties
Setting: Greenhouse
Production by Weight: +70% vs. Comparison Greenhouses · Source Reported
Average Pepper Size: +20–30% vs. Control Specimens · Source Reported
Shelf-Life Test: 30 Days
Decomposition Difference: 10–14 Days Slower · Source Reported
Control Survival During Disease Event: Approximately 1 Week
KPCB Survival During Disease Event: Approximately 3 Additional Weeks
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The source reports 70% more pepper production by weight in the KPCB greenhouse, but the underlying treated and control production weights are not supplied, so the percentage cannot be independently recalculated. Peppers are described as averaging 20–30% larger than control specimens, but individual fruit dimensions and weights are not provided. The source attributes added fruit weight to a thicker skin membrane, but no membrane-thickness measurement is supplied; therefore, that proposed explanation is not presented here as a measured mechanism. During a 30-day shelf-life comparison, treated peppers were reported to decompose 10–14 days later than controls, although storage temperature, humidity, firmness, weight loss, and spoilage-scoring methods are not provided. During a late-season disease outbreak, control plants reportedly died within one week while treated plants survived about three additional weeks. The pathogen, disease severity, number of plants, exposure conditions, and statistical analysis are not supplied, so this result is presented strictly as a field survival observation rather than proof of disease resistance. No Brix, total fruit count, yield per hectare, fertilizer use, pesticide use, irrigation volume, production cost, or economic return measurements were supplied.

Why this matters for pepper growers: This Pepper King Farms case combines production and post-harvest observations from a commercial greenhouse setting. The KPCB greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by weight, with peppers averaging 20–30% larger and decomposing 10–14 days later than control specimens in the documented shelf-life test.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your pepper or greenhouse operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Bell Peppers — Panama
Commercial Greenhouse Case · Bell Peppers · Panama · Spring 2015

70% More Pepper Production by Weight With 10–14 Days Slower Decomposition

At Pepper King Farms in Bajo Boquete, Panama, Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ technology was installed in one greenhouse and compared with the farm's other pepper greenhouses. The KPCB greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by weight, while treated peppers averaged approximately 20–30% larger than control specimens.

+70%
Pepper Production by Weight vs. Comparison Greenhouses
10–14 Days
Slower Decomposition During 30-Day Test
Date
Spring 2015
Location
Bajo Boquete, Panama
Farm
Pepper King Farms
Farm Manager
William Bongiorno
Crop
Bell Peppers & Pepper Varieties
Setting
Greenhouse
Comparison
KPCB Greenhouse vs. Other Farm Greenhouses
Farm History
Greenhouse Production Since 2011
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Case Context Pepper King Farms installed Crop Booster devices in one greenhouse and compared its results with the farm's other greenhouses. Acting farm manager William Bongiorno assisted with the experiment setup.
Pepper King Farms bell pepper greenhouse case study in Bajo Boquete Panama
Pepper King Farms · Bajo Boquete, Panama · Spring 2015
Reported Results

Higher production by weight, larger peppers, and slower decomposition than comparison fruit.

The KPCB greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by weight than the farm's comparison greenhouses. Individual peppers were described as averaging approximately 20–30% larger. In a separate 30-day shelf-life test, similar specimens were stored under the same observation period and KPCB peppers were reported to decompose 10–14 days later than the controls.

+70%
Production by Weight
KPCB greenhouse compared with the farm's other pepper greenhouses.
+20–30%
Average Pepper Size
Treated peppers were reported larger than control specimens.
10–14days
Slower Decomposition
Reported during a 30-day shelf-life comparison.

Higher Production by Weight

The Crop Booster greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by total weight than the farm's comparison greenhouses.

Larger Peppers

Treated peppers were described as averaging approximately 20–30% larger than control specimens.

30-Day Shelf-Life Test

Similar KPCB and control peppers were placed on a shelf and observed over a 30-day period.

Slower Decomposition

The KPCB peppers were reported to decompose approximately 10–14 days later than the comparison peppers.

Result Area Comparison KPCB Result Reported Difference
Pepper Production by Weight Other Farm Greenhouses Higher Production +70%
Average Pepper Size Control Specimens Larger Peppers +20–30%
Decomposition Timing Control Decomposition Rate Slower Decomposition 10–14 Days Later
Shelf-Life Observation Period 30 Days 30 Days Same Test Period
Farm: Pepper King Farms
Farm Manager: William Bongiorno
Location: Bajo Boquete, Panama  ·  Date: Spring 2015
Crop: Bell Peppers & Pepper Varieties
Setting: Greenhouse
Production by Weight: +70% vs. Comparison Greenhouses · Source Reported
Average Pepper Size: +20–30% vs. Control Specimens · Source Reported
Shelf-Life Test Duration: 30 Days
Decomposition Difference: 10–14 Days Slower · Source Reported
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The source consistently describes the KPCB greenhouse as producing 70% more peppers by weight than the comparison greenhouses, although one sentence in the closing paragraph mistakenly states that the control greenhouse produced 70% more. This page follows the internally consistent KPCB-versus-control description. Raw greenhouse production weights are not supplied, so the 70% figure cannot be independently recalculated. Peppers are reported as averaging 20–30% larger than control specimens, but individual fruit dimensions and weights are not provided. The source attributes the larger fruit to thicker cell membranes and greater water content, but no membrane-thickness or fruit water-content measurements are supplied, so that proposed mechanism is not presented as a measured finding. During a 30-day shelf-life comparison, KPCB peppers were reported to decompose 10–14 days later than controls. Storage temperature, humidity, firmness, weight-loss, and spoilage-scoring methods were not supplied. No Brix, fruit count, yield per hectare, fertilizer use, pesticide use, irrigation volume, production costs, or economic-return data were provided.

Why this matters for pepper growers: This Pepper King Farms greenhouse comparison combines production and post-harvest results. The KPCB greenhouse was reported to produce 70% more peppers by weight, with fruit averaging 20–30% larger and decomposing 10–14 days later than control specimens during the documented 30-day shelf-life test.

Field Documentation

See the Pepper King Farms Case Study

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your pepper or greenhouse operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Peppers — Washington, USA
Organic Farm Case · Peppers · Washington, USA · September 2019

10 Brix With 15–20 Peppers Per Plant at Edible Acres Farm

At Edible Acres Farm in Tonasket, Washington, bell peppers and hot red peppers grown with Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ were evaluated three months after planting. The plants were producing 15–20 peppers each, with 80% reported as fully grown, while tested fruit measured 10 Brix.

10Brix
Measured Pepper Brix
15–20 Peppers
Reported Per Plant After Three Months
Results
September 2019
Planted
June 2019
Location
Tonasket, Washington, USA
Farm
Edible Acres Farm
Grower
Art Heinemann
Farm Size
12 Acres
Farm Type
Organic
Crop
Bell Pepper & Hot Red Pepper
KPCB Since
2017
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Case Context Art Heinemann had used Crop Booster technology on multiple fruit and vegetable varieties at Edible Acres beginning in 2017. The peppers documented here were planted in June 2019 and evaluated in September.
Pepper crop at Edible Acres Farm in Tonasket Washington using Kyminasi Plants Crop Booster
Edible Acres Farm · Tonasket, Washington · September 2019
Reported Results

15–20 peppers per plant, 80% fully grown, and fruit measuring 10 Brix.

After approximately three months, the pepper plants were reported to be carrying 15–20 peppers per plant. Eighty percent of the peppers were described as fully grown, with consistent shape and ripeness. Tested peppers measured 10 Brix compared with a stated typical range of 5–7 Brix for the variety.

10Brix
Measured Fruit Brix
Compared with a source-stated typical range of 5–7 Brix.
15–20
Peppers Per Plant
Reported after approximately three months of crop development.
80%
Fully Grown Fruit
Source-reported proportion of peppers described as fully grown.
3months
Observation Period
Peppers planted in June and documented in September 2019.

Consistent Fruit Development

The peppers were described as having consistent shape and ripeness, with 80% of the fruit reported as fully grown.

10 Brix Reading

Tested peppers measured 10 Brix. The source identifies 5–7 Brix as the typical range for the variety.

Continued September Blooming

The pepper plants were still blooming in September, which the grower identified as the end of the local growing season.

Woody Stem Development

Art Heinemann also observed woody stem development on the pepper plants late in the season.

Measurement Reference / Context KPCB Result Interpretation
Brix 5–7 Brix Typical Range 10 Brix Above Entire Stated Range
Brix vs. Upper End 7 Brix 10 Brix ≈ +42.9%
Brix vs. Range Midpoint 6 Brix 10 Brix ≈ +66.7%
Peppers Per Plant Control Count Not Supplied 15–20 Source Reported
Fully Grown Fruit Control Percentage Not Supplied 80% Source Reported
September Flowering End of Local Season Plants Still Blooming Grower Observation
Stem Development Late Season Woody Stems Observed Grower Observation
Farm: Edible Acres Farm
Grower: Art Heinemann
Location: Tonasket, Washington, USA  ·  Farm Size: 12 Acres
Farm Type: Organic
Crop: Bell Pepper & Hot Red Pepper
Planting: June 2019
Results: September 2019
Peppers Per Plant: 15–20
Fully Grown Fruit: 80% · Source Reported
Brix: 10
Source-Stated Typical Brix Range: 5–7
Late-Season Observation: Continued Blooming in September
Stem Observation: Woody Stem Development
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The source reports that tested peppers measured 10 Brix and describes 5–7 Brix as the average or typical range for this variety. It also states that 10 Brix represents a 40% increase. Because 5–7 is a range rather than a single reference value, there is no unique percentage increase: 10 Brix is approximately 42.9% above 7 Brix, 66.7% above the range midpoint of 6 Brix, and 100% above 5 Brix. For this reason, the raw 10 versus 5–7 Brix values are emphasized rather than presenting 40% as an independently calculated result. The source reports 15–20 peppers per plant and 80% fully grown but does not provide a simultaneous untreated control count, total harvested weight, yield per acre, or individual fruit weights. Continued September blooming and woody stem development were grower observations. Although the original source interprets woody stems as evidence that the plants were transitioning toward perennial growth, no multi-season survival or botanical assessment is supplied, so this page does not claim that the pepper plants became perennial. No fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation, production-cost, or economic return measurements were supplied.

Why this matters for pepper growers: This Edible Acres case documents both fruit quality and late-season crop development in northern Washington. Peppers tested at 10 Brix, plants were carrying 15–20 peppers each with 80% reported fully grown, and the crop was still blooming at the end of the local season.

Field Documentation

See the Edible Acres Pepper Case Study

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your pepper or vegetable operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Prev
Next

Harvest Harmonics

We help farmers to increase their crop yield and profit and improve the quality of their products. We have the most advanced crop booster technology in agriculture.

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Successes
  • Contact Us
  • Get a Free Quote

Contact Info

  • geo611 Druid Rd, E Building 201
    Clearwater, FL 33756, USA
  • phone+1 727 324 6750
  • mailservice@harvestharmonics.com
  • mailMon – Fri: 08:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. ET

Social Media