logologo

  • Home
  • Products and Services
    • Crop Booster
    • Bio Booster
    • Yield Max Program
    • Book Pre-Sale Portal
  • Results
  • The Science
    • TRL9
    • Science Documents
    • Science Documents (Spanish)
  • About Us
    • Certifications and Awards Page
    • Our Blog
    • Harvest Harmonics Video Gallery
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
    • Booking
    • We Are Hiring
    • Internships
  • Cart
logologo

  • Home
  • Products and Services
    • Crop Booster
    • Bio Booster
    • Yield Max Program
    • Book Pre-Sale Portal
  • Results
  • The Science
    • TRL9
    • Science Documents
    • Science Documents (Spanish)
  • About Us
    • Certifications and Awards Page
    • Our Blog
    • Harvest Harmonics Video Gallery
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
    • Booking
    • We Are Hiring
    • Internships
  • Cart
  • Home
  • Products and Services
    • Crop Booster
    • Bio Booster
    • Yield Max Program
    • Book Pre-Sale Portal
  • Results
  • The Science
    • TRL9
    • Science Documents
    • Science Documents (Spanish)
  • About Us
    • Certifications and Awards Page
    • Our Blog
    • Harvest Harmonics Video Gallery
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
    • Booking
    • We Are Hiring
    • Internships
  • Cart

Corn

Home / Case Studies / Corn Quality — Colombia
University Field Trial · Corn Quality · Colombia

255% Higher Corn Protein With a 104% Higher Maturity Index

At the Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander experimental farm in Ocaña, Colombia, corn produced with the Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ recorded 3.70% protein compared with 1.04% in the control, while Brix increased, titratable acidity decreased, and the measured maturity index more than doubled.

+255%
Protein Content vs. Control
+104%
Maturity Index vs. Control
Period
September – December 2021
Location
Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia
Crop
Corn
Trial Focus
Grain Quality Parameters
Site
UFPS Ocaña Experimental Farm
Fertilizer
None
Pesticide
None
Analysis
Protein · Brix · Acidity · Maturity · Minerals
Research Team Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar and Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal — Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Ocaña.
Corn grain quality comparison between Crop Booster and control at UFPS Ocaña Colombia
Corn Quality Trial · UFPS Ocaña · Colombia · September–December 2021
Laboratory Quality Results

Higher protein, higher Brix, lower acidity, and a higher maturity index.

Laboratory analysis of harvested corn showed measurable differences across several quality parameters. Protein content increased from 1.04% in the control to 3.70% in the Crop Booster treatment. Brix increased from 8.57 to 11.57, titratable acidity declined from 3.76% to 2.49%, and the maturity index increased from 2.26 to 4.62.

3.70%
Protein Content
Compared with 1.04% in the control, a source-reported increase of 255%.
11.57°Bx
Brix
Control grain measured 8.57°Bx, compared with 11.57°Bx in the Crop Booster treatment.
4.62
Maturity Index
Compared with 2.26 in the control, a source-reported increase of 104%.
7.92%
Mineral Content
Mineral content was reported at 7.92% compared with 4.47% in the control.

Protein

Protein content measured 3.70% in the Crop Booster treatment versus 1.04% in the control.

Brix

Brix increased from 8.57° in the control to 11.57° in the Crop Booster grain.

Lower Acidity

Titratable acidity measured 2.49% in the treated grain compared with 3.76% in the control.

Maturity Index

The measured maturity index increased from 2.26 in the control to 4.62 in the Crop Booster treatment.

Quality Parameter Crop Booster Control Difference
Protein Content 3.70% 1.04% +255%
Brix 11.57°Bx 8.57°Bx +35%
Titratable Acidity 2.49% 3.76% −33%
Maturity Index 4.62 2.26 +104%
Mineral Content 7.92% 4.47% +77%
Institution: Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander — Ocaña
Researchers: Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar · Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal
Location: Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia  ·  Period: September–December 2021
Crop: Corn  ·  Trial Focus: Harvested Grain Quality
Fertilization: None  ·  Pesticides: None

The supplied source reports laboratory measurements for protein, Brix, titratable acidity, maturity index, and mineral content. The percentage differences shown above are those reported in the source. This page does not infer specific market premiums, nutritional outcomes, feed conversion improvements, or physiological mechanisms from these measurements.

Why this matters for corn growers: Yield is only one dimension of crop performance. In this Ocaña university trial, the harvested grain also showed measurable differences in composition and maturity. Protein increased from 1.04% to 3.70%, Brix from 8.57 to 11.57, mineral content from 4.47% to 7.92%, and the maturity index from 2.26 to 4.62, while titratable acidity decreased from 3.76% to 2.49%.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Corn — Colombia
University Field Trial · Corn · Colombia

50% Less Irrigation Water With 75% Less Pest Damage

At the Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander experimental farm in Ocaña, Colombia, corn using the Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ required 94,770 liters of irrigation water compared with 189,540 liters in the control. Pest damage measured 10% in the treated field versus 40% in the control, with no fertilizer or pesticide applied to either treatment.

−50%
Irrigation Water vs. Control
−75% Pest Damage
10% Treated vs. 40% Control
Period
September – December 2021
Location
Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia
Crop
Corn
Trial Type
Side-by-Side Treated vs. Control
Site
UFPS Ocaña Experimental Farm
Fertilizer
None in Either Treatment
Pesticide
None in Either Treatment
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Research Team Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar and Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal — Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Ocaña.
Corn field trial comparing Crop Booster and control at Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña Colombia
Corn Field Trial · UFPS Ocaña · Colombia · September–December 2021
Measured Field Results

Half the irrigation volume and substantially lower pest damage.

The Crop Booster-treated field used 94,770 liters of irrigation water during the trial compared with 189,540 liters in the control, a 50% reduction. Pest damage was measured at 10% in the treated corn compared with 40% in the control. Neither treatment received fertilizer or pesticide.

94,770L
Treated Water Use
Compared with 189,540 liters in the control field.
50%
Less Irrigation Water
The treated field used exactly half the recorded irrigation volume of the control.
10%
Pest Damage
Compared with 40% pest damage measured in the control field.
0
Fertilizer & Pesticide
Neither the treated nor control field received fertilizer or pesticide.

50% Lower Water Use

Recorded irrigation volume was 94,770 L in the Crop Booster field versus 189,540 L in the control.

75% Lower Pest Damage

Pest damage measured 10% in the treated crop compared with 40% in the control.

No Fertilizer

No fertilizer was applied to either the Crop Booster treatment or the control during the trial.

No Pesticide

Both fields received zero pesticide, allowing pest damage to be compared without pesticide use as a variable.

Total Irrigation Water Used During Trial
Crop Booster
94,770 L
94,770 L
Control
189,540 L
189,540 L

The Crop Booster treatment used exactly 50% of the irrigation volume recorded for the control field: 94,770 liters compared with 189,540 liters.

Measurement Crop Booster Control Difference
Water Consumption 94,770 L 189,540 L −50%
Fertilizer Use 0 0 Same
Pesticide Use 0 0 Same
Pest Damage 10% 40% −75%
Institution: Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander — Ocaña
Researchers: Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar · Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal
Location: Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia  ·  Period: September–December 2021
Crop: Corn  ·  Trial: Side-by-Side Crop Booster vs. Control
Water: 94,770 L Treated vs. 189,540 L Control
Pest Damage: 10% Treated vs. 40% Control
Fertilizer: None  ·  Pesticide: None

This case study documents irrigation volume, fertilizer use, pesticide use, and measured pest damage. The supplied source does not provide an absolute yield value for this specific result set, so no yield increase or yield preservation claim is included here. The data also do not establish a biological mechanism explaining the lower pest damage.

Why this matters for corn growers: This university field trial documented two major operational differences at the same time: substantially lower irrigation demand and substantially lower pest damage. The Crop Booster field used 94,770 liters of water compared with 189,540 liters in the control and recorded 10% pest damage compared with 40%, while neither treatment received fertilizer or pesticide.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn or row-crop operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Corn Architecture — Colombia
University Field Trial · Corn Architecture · Colombia

55% Thicker Corn Stems With Wider Leaves and More Leaves Per Plant

At the Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander experimental farm in Ocaña, Colombia, corn receiving Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ treated irrigation measured 2.76 cm in stem thickness compared with 1.78 cm in the control at day 76. Treated plants also had wider leaves and more leaves per plant.

+55%
Stem Thickness vs. Control
+2.48 Leaves
More Leaves Per Plant
Period
September – December 2021
Location
Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia
Crop
Corn
Trial Focus
Plant Architecture
Site
UFPS Ocaña Experimental Farm
Measurement
Final Harvest · Day 76
Fertilizer
None
Pesticide
None
Research Team Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar and Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal — Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Ocaña.
Measured Plant Architecture

Thicker stems, wider leaves, and more leaves per plant at harvest.

At the day-76 harvest, researchers measured clear structural differences between the Crop Booster and control plants. Treated corn averaged 2.76 cm in stem thickness, 9.08 cm in leaf width, and 11.64 leaves per plant compared with 1.78 cm, 6.89 cm, and 9.16 leaves respectively in the control.

2.76cm
Stem Thickness
Compared with 1.78 cm in the control, a measured increase of approximately 55%.
9.08cm
Leaf Width
Control plants measured 6.89 cm in leaf width, a difference of 2.19 cm.
11.64
Leaves Per Plant
Compared with 9.16 leaves per plant in the control.
76 days
Final Measurement
Plant architecture measurements were recorded at final harvest on day 76.

Thicker Stems

Average stem thickness measured 2.76 cm in the Crop Booster treatment versus 1.78 cm in the control.

Wider Leaves

Average leaf width measured 9.08 cm in treated plants compared with 6.89 cm in the control.

More Leaves

Treated plants averaged 11.64 leaves per plant compared with 9.16 leaves in the control.

Same Input Conditions

The supplied trial documentation reports zero fertilizer and zero pesticide use during this study.

Parameter at Day 76 Crop Booster Control Difference
Stem Thickness 2.76 cm 1.78 cm +55%
Leaf Width 9.08 cm 6.89 cm +2.19 cm · +32%
Leaves Per Plant 11.64 9.16 +2.48 · +27%
Institution: Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander — Ocaña
Researchers: Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar · Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal
Location: Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia  ·  Period: September–December 2021
Crop: Corn  ·  Measurement: Final Harvest · Day 76
Stem Thickness: 2.76 cm Treated vs. 1.78 cm Control
Leaf Width: 9.08 cm Treated vs. 6.89 cm Control
Leaves Per Plant: 11.64 Treated vs. 9.16 Control
Fertilizer: None  ·  Pesticide: None

This case study documents measured plant architecture at harvest: stem thickness, leaf width, and number of leaves per plant. The source does not directly measure lodging resistance, canopy light interception, weed suppression, photosynthetic rate, biomass, or the causal relationship between these structural measurements and other results reported elsewhere in the broader Ocaña corn trial.

Why this matters for corn growers: Plant architecture provides a direct way to compare how the crop developed under each treatment. In this university trial, Crop Booster plants finished the 76-day cycle with stems measuring 2.76 cm versus 1.78 cm, leaves measuring 9.08 cm versus 6.89 cm in width, and 11.64 versus 9.16 leaves per plant. All three measured architecture parameters favored the Crop Booster treatment.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn or row-crop operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Corn Growth — Colombia
University Field Trial · Corn Growth · Colombia

Corn Reached 281.16 cm in 76 Days vs. 104.56 cm in the Control

At the Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander experimental farm in Ocaña, Colombia, researchers measured corn height at four stages of the growing cycle. By harvest on day 76, the Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ treatment averaged 281.16 cm compared with 104.56 cm in the control, a difference of 176.60 cm.

281.16cm
Crop Booster Height at Day 76
+176.60 cm
Final Height Difference vs. Control
Period
September – December 2021
Location
Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia
Crop
Corn
Trial Focus
Plant Height Across Growth Cycle
Site
UFPS Ocaña Experimental Farm
Measurements
Days 19 · 38 · 57 · 76
Fertilizer
None
Pesticide
None
Research Team Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar and Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal — Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Ocaña.
Growth Cycle Measurements

The height difference was measurable at every recorded stage.

Researchers recorded plant height at approximately 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the 76-day cycle. Crop Booster plants averaged 46.06 cm on day 19, 192.00 cm on day 38, 271.48 cm on day 57, and 281.16 cm at harvest. Control measurements were 19.56 cm, 42.76 cm, 103.48 cm, and 104.56 cm respectively.

Corn Plant Height Across the 76-Day Growth Cycle

Bar lengths are scaled to the maximum measured height of 281.16 cm. Values shown are treatment means.

25% Day 19
46.06
19.56
+135%
50% Day 38
192.00
42.76
+349%
75% Day 57
271.48
103.48
+162%
100% Day 76
281.16
104.56
+169%
Crop Booster
Control
281.16cm
Final Treated Height
Crop Booster plants averaged 281.16 ± 3.44 cm at harvest on day 76.
104.56cm
Final Control Height
Control plants averaged 104.56 ± 28.87 cm at the same harvest stage.
+176.6cm
Final Height Difference
The measured difference between treatment means at day 76 was 176.60 cm.
4
Measurement Stages
Plant height was recorded on days 19, 38, 57, and 76.

Day 19

Treated plants averaged 46.06 cm compared with 19.56 cm in the control.

Day 38

Crop Booster plants measured 192.00 cm compared with 42.76 cm in the control, the largest relative difference reported in the four-stage dataset.

Day 57

Treated plants averaged 271.48 cm compared with 103.48 cm in the control.

Day 76 Harvest

Final average height measured 281.16 cm in the Crop Booster treatment and 104.56 cm in the control.

Growth Stage Crop Booster Control Difference
25% · Day 19 46.06 ± 10.89 cm 19.56 ± 4.20 cm +135%
50% · Day 38 192.00 ± 12.18 cm 42.76 ± 13.97 cm +349%
75% · Day 57 271.48 ± 6.19 cm 103.48 ± 24.51 cm +162%
100% · Day 76 281.16 ± 3.44 cm 104.56 ± 28.87 cm +169% · +176.60 cm
Institution: Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander — Ocaña
Researchers: Daniel Antonio Hernandez Villamizar · Luis Carlos Herrera Carvajal
Location: Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia  ·  Period: September–December 2021
Crop: Corn  ·  Measurements: Days 19 · 38 · 57 · 76
Final Height: 281.16 ± 3.44 cm Treated vs. 104.56 ± 28.87 cm Control
Final Difference: +176.60 cm · Approximately +169%
Fertilizer: None  ·  Pesticide: None

Values are presented exactly as supplied, including the reported standard deviations. This case study measures plant height across four stages of the corn growth cycle. Plant height alone does not establish yield, root development, lodging resistance, water efficiency, pest resistance, grain quality, or the biological mechanism behind the measured differences. Those outcomes require their own measurements and should be evaluated separately.

Why this matters for corn growers: Unlike a single end-of-season observation, this trial followed plant height through four points in the growth cycle. The treatment difference was already measurable by day 19 and remained present through harvest. At day 76, Crop Booster plants averaged 281.16 cm compared with 104.56 cm in the control, a final difference of 176.60 cm.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn or row-crop operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Creole Corn — Colombia
University Field Trial · Creole Corn · Colombia · 2025

295–321 Kernels Per Ear With 11–12 Kernel Rows in Creole Corn

In a 108-day field trial at Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander in Ocaña, Colombia, Creole corn receiving Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ treatment produced ears with 295–321 kernels and 11–12 kernel rows. Treated plants also measured 2.0–2.6 cm in stem diameter and reached 2.8–3.5 meters in height under flood irrigation.

295–321
Kernels Per Ear in Crop Booster Treatment
11–12 Rows
Kernel Rows Per Ear
Period
March 11 – June 27, 2025
Duration
108 Days
Location
Ocaña, Colombia
Crop
Creole / Criollo Corn
Irrigation
Flood Irrigation
Site
UFPS Ocaña Experimental Farm
Trial Focus
Ear Filling & Plant Development
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Researcher Daniel Antonio Hernández Villamizar — Francisco de Paula Santander University, Colombia.
Creole corn ear filling with Crop Booster treatment at UFPS Ocaña Colombia in 2025
Crop Booster-Treated Creole Corn · UFPS Ocaña · Colombia · March–June 2025
Kernel row comparison graph from Creole corn trial at UFPS Ocaña Colombia
Trial Documentation · Number of Kernel Rows Per Ear
Harvest & Plant Measurements

Fuller ears alongside measurable differences in stem, height, and leaf size.

At the end of the 108-day cycle, Crop Booster-treated Creole corn ears were reported with 295–321 kernels and 11–12 kernel rows. Treated plants also recorded stem diameters of 2.0–2.6 cm, heights of 2.8–3.5 m, and leaf dimensions of approximately 95–105 cm long by 12–15 cm wide.

295–321
Kernels Per Ear
Kernel counts reported for Crop Booster-treated Creole corn ears.
11–12
Kernel Rows Per Ear
The treated ears were reported with 11–12 rows of kernels.
2.0–2.6cm
Stem Diameter
Control stem diameters were reported in the 1.1–1.8 cm range.
2.8–3.5m
Plant Height
Recorded height range for the Crop Booster-treated plants.

Kernel Filling

Crop Booster ears were reported with 295–321 kernels per ear at harvest.

Kernel Rows

Treated Creole corn ears were reported with 11–12 kernel rows per ear.

Stem Diameter

Treated plants measured 2.0–2.6 cm in stem diameter compared with a reported control range of 1.1–1.8 cm.

Leaf Development

Treated leaves were reported at approximately 95–105 cm long and 12–15 cm wide.

Parameter Crop Booster Control Reported Comparison
Kernels Per Ear 295–321 Lower Count Higher in Crop Booster
Kernel Rows Per Ear 11–12 Fewer Rows Higher in Crop Booster
Stem Diameter 2.0–2.6 cm 1.1–1.8 cm +30–60% Reported
Plant Height 2.8–3.5 m Lower Favored Crop Booster
Leaf Size 95–105 × 12–15 cm Smaller Favored Crop Booster
Institution: Francisco de Paula Santander University — Ocaña
Researcher: Daniel Antonio Hernández Villamizar
Location: Ocaña, Colombia  ·  Period: March 11 – June 27, 2025
Duration: 108 Days  ·  Crop: Creole / Criollo Corn
Irrigation: Flood  ·  Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Kernels Per Ear: 295–321  ·  Kernel Rows: 11–12
Stem Diameter: 2.0–2.6 cm Treated vs. 1.1–1.8 cm Control
Plant Height: 2.8–3.5 m
Leaf Dimensions: 95–105 cm × 12–15 cm

The supplied case-study documentation provides exact Crop Booster ranges for kernels per ear, kernel rows, stem diameter, plant height, and leaf dimensions. Exact numerical control values were not supplied for kernel count, kernel rows, plant height, or leaf dimensions, so those control comparisons remain qualitative. The source reports a 30–60% stem-diameter improvement alongside the supplied 2.0–2.6 cm treated and 1.1–1.8 cm control ranges.

Why this matters for corn growers: This 2025 university trial documents performance at both the ear and whole-plant level. Crop Booster-treated Creole corn produced ears containing 295–321 kernels across 11–12 rows, while the treated plants also recorded larger stem-diameter measurements and substantial plant height and leaf dimensions. Together, these measurements provide a detailed picture of how the treated crop developed through the 108-day cycle.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Corn Master Summary — Colombia
University Thesis Trial · Corn · Colombia

583% Higher Forage Yield With 50% Less Irrigation Water

In a university corn trial at Francisco de Paula Santander University in Ocaña, Colombia, the Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ treatment was reported with 67,992 kg/ha of additional forage, two ears per plant instead of one, substantially greater plant development, higher measured grain-quality parameters, and 50% lower irrigation water use.

+583%
Source-Reported Forage Yield Increase
2 Ears / Plant
Compared With 1 Ear Per Plant in Control
Date
September 2021
Location
Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia
Crop
Corn
Trial Type
University Thesis · Treated vs. Control
Field Size
1 Hectare Per Treatment
Water Result
50% Less in Crop Booster Field
Fertilizer
None in Either Treatment
Institution
Francisco de Paula Santander University
Faculty Lead MSc. Daniel Hernández — Dean, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, UFPS Ocaña.
Corn trial results comparing Crop Booster and control at UFPS Ocaña Colombia
Corn Trial Results · UFPS Ocaña · Colombia · September 2021
Trial Summary

Forage production, plant development, grain quality, and water use measured in the same trial.

The supplied thesis summary combines measurements from several dimensions of corn performance. The Crop Booster field was reported with 67,992 kg/ha of additional forage, two ears per plant compared with one in the control, taller plants, thicker stems, higher kernel protein, and half the irrigation water consumption.

+583%
Forage Yield
Source-reported forage production increase, representing 67,992 kg/ha of additional forage.
2
Ears Per Plant
Crop Booster plants produced two ears per plant compared with one in the control.
−50%
Irrigation Water
94,770 L/ha in the treated field compared with 189,540 L/ha in the control.
0
Fertilizer Applied
The supplied trial documentation reports no fertilizer in either treatment.

Plant Height

Crop Booster corn measured approximately 282 cm compared with approximately 105 cm in the control.

Stem Diameter

Treated stems measured 2.76 cm compared with 1.78 cm in the control, a reported increase of 55%.

Kernel Protein

Kernel protein measured 3.70% in the Crop Booster treatment compared with 1.04% in the control.

Pest Observation

The source reports lower overall pest damage and lower armyworm incidence in the treated field, with no pesticide applied to either treatment.

The KPCB-treated corn had better color, size and health than the control. The plants had more leaves overall, and the leaves were bigger and wider than the control plants.

MSc. Daniel Hernández · Dean, Faculty of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences · UFPS Ocaña
Parameter Crop Booster Control Reported Difference
Production
Additional Forage Production +67,992 kg/ha Baseline +583% Reported
Ears Per Plant 2 1 +100%
Plant Architecture
Plant Height 282 cm 105 cm +169%
Stem Diameter 2.76 cm 1.78 cm +55%
Grain & Forage Quality
Kernel Protein 3.70% 1.04% +255%
Brix +3° Baseline Higher
Titratable Acidity −1.25 Source-Reported Difference Baseline Lower
Forage Protein +2.65 percentage points Baseline Higher
Forage Fat +0.64 percentage points Baseline Higher
Forage Minerals +3.45 percentage points Baseline Higher
Resource Use
Water Consumption 94,770 L/ha 189,540 L/ha −50% · −94,770 L/ha
Fertilizer Applied 0 0 Same
Pesticide Applied 0 0 Same
Institution: Francisco de Paula Santander University — Ocaña
Faculty Lead: MSc. Daniel Hernández
Location: Ocaña, Norte de Santander, Colombia  ·  Date: September 2021
Crop: Corn  ·  Trial Type: University Thesis · Treated vs. Control
Field Size: 1 Hectare Per Treatment
Forage Result: +67,992 kg/ha · +583% Reported
Ears Per Plant: 2 Treated vs. 1 Control
Plant Height: 282 cm Treated vs. 105 cm Control
Stem Diameter: 2.76 cm Treated vs. 1.78 cm Control
Kernel Protein: 3.70% Treated vs. 1.04% Control
Water: 94,770 L/ha Treated vs. 189,540 L/ha Control
Fertilizer: None  ·  Pesticide: None

This page is a master summary of measurements supplied for the Ocaña university corn trial. The source reports a 583% forage-yield increase and 67,992 kg/ha of additional forage. It also reports two ears per treated plant compared with one in the control; this is a 100% increase in ears per plant, but the supplied summary does not provide absolute harvested grain weight per hectare, so it should not be interpreted here as a directly measured 100% increase in total grain yield. The source also lists a 1.25-unit reduction for titratable acidity; because titratable acidity is not ordinarily expressed as soil or solution pH, the value is preserved as a source-reported acidity difference rather than relabeled as a pH measurement.

Why this matters for corn growers: This thesis summary is valuable because it documents multiple parts of crop performance within the same side-by-side project. The treated field was reported with substantially higher forage production, twice as many ears per plant, greater plant height and stem diameter, higher kernel protein, and half the irrigation water consumption. Looking at these measurements together provides a broader view of crop performance than relying on a single endpoint.

Field Documentation

See the Corn Trial Results

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn or row-crop operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Corn — Ibagué, Colombia
Early Growth Field Trial · Corn · Colombia

35% More Corn Foliage With a 15 cm Height Advantage in 22 Days

On a one-hectare corn field in Ibagué, Colombia, Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ treated irrigation produced 35% more foliage and a 15 cm greater stalk height than the untreated control after just 22 days of growth and four drip-irrigation applications.

+35%
More Foliage vs. Control at Day 22
+15 cm Taller
Stalk Height Advantage vs. Control
Date
September 2020
Location
Ibagué, Colombia
Crop
Corn
Field Size
1 Hectare
Irrigation
Drip
Applications
4 Irrigation Cycles
Observation
22 Days After Germination
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Trial Setup The Crop Booster was installed on a one-hectare corn field and compared with an untreated control under the supplied side-by-side trial conditions.
Corn comparison between Crop Booster treated and control plants in Ibagué Colombia
Corn Comparison · Ibagué, Colombia · September 2020
Early Growth Results

Visible development differences after four irrigations and 22 days.

At the 22-day observation, treated corn plants were reported with 35% more foliage and a 15 cm greater stalk height than the control. The Crop Booster plants were also visually documented with thicker stalks, darker green foliage, and more abundant root systems.

+35%
More Foliage
Foliage volume was reported as 35% greater than the untreated control at day 22.
+15cm
Height Advantage
Treated corn stalks were reported 15 cm taller than control plants.
22days
Observation Period
The documented comparison was made 22 days after germination.
4
Irrigation Applications
Four drip-irrigation cycles were applied before the observation.

Thicker Stalks

Crop Booster-treated corn was visually reported with thicker stalks than the untreated control.

Darker Green Foliage

Treated plants were documented with a deeper green leaf color than the control plants.

More Abundant Roots

Root comparisons showed more abundant root development in the Crop Booster treatment.

Early Development

The measured and visual differences were already present after 22 days and four irrigation cycles.

Indicator at Day 22 Crop Booster Control Difference
Foliage Volume +35% Baseline +35%
Stalk Height +15 cm Baseline +15 cm
Stalk Thickness Thicker Standard Favored Crop Booster
Leaf Color Darker Green Lighter Visibly Different
Root System More Abundant Standard Favored Crop Booster
Location: Ibagué, Colombia  ·  Date: September 2020
Crop: Corn  ·  Field Size: 1 Hectare
Irrigation: Drip  ·  Applications: 4
Observation: 22 Days After Germination
Foliage: +35% vs. Control  ·  Height: +15 cm vs. Control
Additional Observations: Thicker Stalks · Darker Green Foliage · More Abundant Roots

The supplied case study provides quantitative differences for foliage volume and stalk height and qualitative observations for stalk thickness, foliage color, and root abundance. It does not provide absolute plant heights, numerical stalk-diameter measurements, chlorophyll or photosynthesis readings, numerical root measurements, yield data, or a measured mechanism explaining the observed differences.

Why this matters for corn growers: This Ibagué trial documents early crop-development differences within a short observation window. After 22 days and four drip-irrigation applications, the Crop Booster treatment showed 35% more foliage and a 15 cm height advantage over the control, along with qualitative differences in stalk thickness, foliage color, and root development.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your corn or row-crop operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Home / Case Studies / Fodder Corn — Ecuador
University Field Trial · Fodder Corn · Ecuador

86 t/ha Fodder Corn Yield With Plants Reaching 4.20 Meters

At the Polytechnic School of Chimborazo in Riobamba, Ecuador, fodder corn receiving Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ treatment produced 86 tonnes per hectare. The supplied case study compares this with a historical yield range of 45–50 t/ha for the area and cultivar, while treated plants averaged 4.20 m in height compared with 2.06 m in the supplied plant-height comparison.

+81%
Source-Reported Yield Increase vs. Historical Benchmark
4.20 m
Treated Average Plant Height
Date
November 2021
Location
Riobamba, Ecuador
Crop
Fodder Corn
Primary Use
Animal Feed / Silage
Treated Yield
86 t/ha
Yield Benchmark
45–50 t/ha Historical Range
Treated Height
4.20 m
Comparison Height
2.06 m
Research Partner Polytechnic School of Chimborazo (ESPOCH) — Riobamba, Ecuador.
Fodder corn comparison at ESPOCH in Riobamba Ecuador showing Crop Booster treated plants
Fodder Corn Trial · ESPOCH · Riobamba, Ecuador · November 2021
Field Results

86 tonnes per hectare with substantially taller plants.

Harvested fodder corn yield reached 86 t/ha. The supplied case study compares this result with the area's historical 45–50 t/ha range for the same crop and cultivar. Treated plants also averaged 4.20 m in height compared with 2.06 m in the supplied plant-height comparison.

86t/ha
Harvested Fodder Yield
Yield reported for the Crop Booster-treated fodder corn field.
45–50t/ha
Historical Benchmark
Historical yield range supplied for the area and cultivar.
4.20m
Treated Plant Height
Average Crop Booster plant height reported in the case study.
2.06m
Comparison Plant Height
The supplied comparison height for untreated plants.

86 t/ha Yield

The Crop Booster-treated field produced 86 tonnes of fresh fodder corn per hectare.

Historical Benchmark

The source identifies 45–50 t/ha as the historical yield range for the area and cultivar.

4.20 m Plant Height

Treated fodder corn plants averaged 4.20 meters compared with 2.06 meters in the supplied height comparison.

ESPOCH Research Setting

The field result was documented in collaboration with the Polytechnic School of Chimborazo in Riobamba.

Measurement Crop Booster Comparison Difference
Fresh Fodder Yield 86 t/ha 45–50 t/ha Historical +81% Source-Reported
Average Plant Height 4.20 m 2.06 m +104%
Institution: Polytechnic School of Chimborazo (ESPOCH)
Location: Riobamba, Ecuador  ·  Date: November 2021
Crop: Fodder Corn  ·  Use: Animal Feed / Silage
Harvested Yield: 86 t/ha
Historical Yield Benchmark: 45–50 t/ha
Treated Plant Height: 4.20 m  ·  Comparison Height: 2.06 m
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The supplied source reports an 81% increase in fodder yield and provides 86 t/ha as the treated result against a historical area-and-cultivar range of 45–50 t/ha. Because that yield benchmark is historical rather than a documented side-by-side control yield, it is presented separately from the plant-height comparison. The supplied height values of 4.20 m and 2.06 m represent approximately a 104% difference. The source does not provide feed-quality analysis, livestock-performance measurements, herd-capacity data, or economic cost-per-ton calculations.

Why this matters for fodder-corn growers: For forage production, harvested biomass per hectare is the central result. In this ESPOCH case, the treated fodder corn produced 86 t/ha against a supplied historical range of 45–50 t/ha for the area and cultivar. The plants also averaged 4.20 m in height compared with 2.06 m in the documented plant-height comparison.

Field Documentation

See the Fodder Corn Trial in Ecuador

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your forage, corn, or livestock operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Prev
Next

Harvest Harmonics

We help farmers to increase their crop yield and profit and improve the quality of their products. We have the most advanced crop booster technology in agriculture.

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Successes
  • Contact Us
  • Get a Free Quote

Contact Info

  • geo611 Druid Rd, E Building 201
    Clearwater, FL 33756, USA
  • phone+1 727 324 6750
  • mailservice@harvestharmonics.com
  • mailMon – Fri: 08:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. ET

Social Media