Wheat

Gramineous Wheat

Wheat

Multi-Site Field Trial · Wheat · Uzbekistan · 2026

Up to 27.9% Higher Wheat Yield Across Three Uzbekistan Trial Results

In 2026 wheat trials across Khorezm, Bukhara and Jizzakh in Uzbekistan, Kyminasi® Crop Booster™ treatments increased yield in all three reported comparisons, with calculated gains ranging from 11.3% to 27.9%.

+27.9%
Highest Measured Yield Increase · Wheat 4
+12 Centner/Ha
55 vs. 43 · Wheat 4
Date
2026
Country
Uzbekistan
Regions
Khorezm · Bukhara · Jizzakh
Crop
Wheat
Trials
Wheat 2 · Wheat 3 · Wheat 4
Irrigation
Flow / Surface Irrigation
Researchers
Siroj Hosilbekov · Karimquliev Askar Rustamovich · Karimquliev Dilmurod Askarovich
Supervisor
Dr. Mokhira Kurambaeva
Institution
Central Asian Green University
Technology
Kyminasi® Crop Booster™
Trial Context Three wheat comparisons were reported across the listed regions of Uzbekistan. The supplied material identifies the yield comparisons as Wheat 2, Wheat 3 and Wheat 4, but does not map each trial number to a specific region.
Wheat Crop Booster trials in Khorezm Bukhara and Jizzakh Uzbekistan
Wheat Field Trials · Uzbekistan · 2026
Measured Wheat Yield Results

Every reported wheat comparison produced higher yield with Crop Booster.

Wheat 2 increased from 62 to 69 centners per hectare, Wheat 3 increased from 60 to 68, and Wheat 4 increased from 43 to 55. These raw values calculate to yield increases of approximately 11.29%, 13.33% and 27.91%, respectively.

+11.3%
Wheat 2 Yield
69 centner/ha with Crop Booster vs. 62 in control.
+13.3%
Wheat 3 Yield
68 centner/ha with Crop Booster vs. 60 in control.
+27.9%
Wheat 4 Yield
55 centner/ha with Crop Booster vs. 43 in control.
+5–12%
Plant Height
Source-reported range compared with control plants.

Higher Yield in All Three Trials

Every supplied treatment-versus-control comparison showed a higher wheat yield with Crop Booster.

Taller Plants

The source reports that treated wheat plants were approximately 5% to 12% taller than the control plants.

Thicker Root Systems

Crop Booster-treated plants were described as developing thicker root systems than control plants.

Darker Green Foliage

Treated wheat plants were reported to show darker green foliage during vegetative growth.

Wheat Trial Control Crop Booster Calculated Gain
Wheat 2 62 Centner/Ha 69 Centner/Ha +7 · +11.29%
Wheat 3 60 Centner/Ha 68 Centner/Ha +8 · +13.33%
Wheat 4 43 Centner/Ha 55 Centner/Ha +12 · +27.91%
Plant Height Control Baseline Taller +5–12% · Source Reported
Root System Control Thicker Qualitative Observation
Foliage Control Darker Green Qualitative Observation
Country: Uzbekistan
Regions Listed: Khorezm · Bukhara · Jizzakh
Date: 2026
Crop: Wheat
Irrigation: Flow Irrigation / Surface Irrigation
Researchers: Siroj Hosilbekov · Karimquliev Askar Rustamovich · Karimquliev Dilmurod Askarovich
Supervisor: Dr. Mokhira Kurambaeva
Institution: Central Asian Green University

Wheat 2 Control Yield: 62 Centner/Ha
Wheat 2 Crop Booster Yield: 69 Centner/Ha
Wheat 2 Calculated Increase: +11.29%

Wheat 3 Control Yield: 60 Centner/Ha
Wheat 3 Crop Booster Yield: 68 Centner/Ha
Wheat 3 Calculated Increase: +13.33%

Wheat 4 Control Yield: 43 Centner/Ha
Wheat 4 Crop Booster Yield: 55 Centner/Ha
Wheat 4 Calculated Increase: +27.91%

Source-Reported Plant Height: 5–12% Taller Than Control
Root Observation: Thicker Root Systems
Foliage Observation: Darker Green
Technology: Kyminasi® Crop Booster™

The supplied wheat trial reports control and Crop Booster yields of 62 and 69 centners per hectare for Wheat 2, 60 and 68 for Wheat 3, and 43 and 55 for Wheat 4. These values calculate to increases of approximately 11.29%, 13.33% and 27.91%, respectively, consistent with the rounded source figures of 11%, 13% and 27% and with the narrative figures of 11.3%, 13.3% and 27.9%. The source lists Khorezm, Bukhara and Jizzakh as the three trial regions but does not identify which region corresponds to Wheat 2, Wheat 3 or Wheat 4; this page therefore does not assign individual trial numbers to specific regions. The source also reports treated plants as 5–12% taller than controls, with thicker root systems and darker green foliage, but does not provide the individual plant-height measurements, root measurements, chlorophyll, SPAD, NDVI, biomass measurements, sample counts or statistical analysis underlying those observations. The term “significant” in the supplied narrative is therefore treated as descriptive rather than as a claim of statistical significance. No wheat variety, grain-quality data, protein content, fertilizer-use comparison, pesticide-use comparison, irrigation volume, production costs, revenue or economic-return data were supplied.

Why this matters for wheat growers: This multi-site Uzbekistan trial reports higher wheat yield in every supplied treatment comparison. The strongest result increased from 43 to 55 centners per hectare, while the other two comparisons increased from 62 to 69 and from 60 to 68 centners per hectare.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your wheat or grain operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Wheat Field Trial · Village Lani Wala · September 2024

13.6% Higher Wheat Grain Yield With Disease Score Reduced From 2 to 0

In a 1.5-acre wheat field comparison at Village Lani Wala, P.O. Kot Fateh Khan, both treatment and control fields received equal crop inputs. The Crop Booster field was flood irrigated with Kyminasi water and produced a grain yield of 54.7 compared with 48.14 in the control.

+13.6%
Grain Yield · 54.7 vs. 48.14
Disease Score 0
vs. 2 in Control
Date
September 2024
Location
Village Lani Wala · P.O. Kot Fateh Khan
Crop
Wheat
Field Size
1.5 Acres
Irrigation
Flood Irrigation
Inputs
Both Fields Treated Equally
Test Field
Flooded With Kyminasi Water
Control Field
Flooded With Standard Water
Control Yield
48.14
KPCB Yield
54.7
Trial Context Both wheat fields were reported to receive the same crop inputs. The stated treatment difference was the use of Kyminasi-treated irrigation water in the test field compared with standard irrigation water in the control field.
Wheat Crop Booster field comparison at Village Lani Wala
Wheat Field Comparison · Village Lani Wala · September 2024
Measured Wheat Results

Grain yield increased by 6.56 units while the recorded disease score fell from 2 to 0.

The control field recorded a grain yield of 48.14 compared with 54.7 in the Crop Booster treatment. The absolute difference was 6.56, equal to a calculated increase of approximately 13.63%. At 95 days, treated plants were also 4 cm taller, while the recorded disease score was 0 compared with 2 in the control.

+13.6%
Grain Yield
54.7 with Crop Booster vs. 48.14 in the control.
+6.56
Absolute Yield Difference
Difference between the supplied treatment and control values.
0
Treated Disease Score
Compared with a disease score of 2 in the control field.
+5.8%
Plant Height
73 cm vs. 69 cm at 95 days.

Higher Grain Yield

Crop Booster-treated wheat recorded a grain yield of 54.7 compared with 48.14 in the control field.

4 cm Taller at 95 Days

Plant height was measured at 73 cm in the treatment compared with 69 cm in the control, a calculated increase of approximately 5.8%.

Disease Score Reduced to Zero

The supplied measurements show a disease score of 2 in the control and 0 in the Crop Booster treatment.

Equal Crop Inputs

Both fields were reported to receive equal agricultural inputs, with irrigation water identified as the treatment difference.

Measurement Control Crop Booster Calculated Change
Grain Yield 48.14 54.7 +6.56 · +13.63%
Plant Height at 95 Days 69 cm 73 cm +4 cm · +5.80%
Disease Score 2 0 −2 · 100% Reduction in Recorded Score
Irrigation Type Flood · Standard Water Flood · Kyminasi Water Treatment Difference
Crop Inputs Equal Inputs Equal Inputs Source Reported
Location: Village Lani Wala · P.O. Kot Fateh Khan
Date: September 2024
Crop: Wheat
Field Size: 1.5 Acres
Irrigation: Flood Irrigation
Input Treatment: Both Fields Reported to Receive Equal Inputs
Control Irrigation: Standard Water
Test Irrigation: Kyminasi-Treated Water

Control Grain Yield: 48.14
Crop Booster Grain Yield: 54.7
Absolute Grain Yield Difference: +6.56
Calculated Grain Yield Increase: +13.63%

Control Plant Height at 95 Days: 69 cm
Crop Booster Plant Height at 95 Days: 73 cm
Absolute Height Difference: +4 cm
Calculated Height Increase: +5.80%

Control Disease Score: 2
Crop Booster Disease Score: 0
Recorded Disease Score Reduction: 100%
Technology: Kyminasi® Crop Booster™

The supplied wheat case reports a grain yield of 48.14 in the control field and 54.7 in the Crop Booster field. The difference is 6.56, and (54.7 − 48.14) ÷ 48.14 × 100 equals approximately 13.63%, consistent with the rounded 14% figure in the source. The source also separately states that Kyminasi wheat yield was 12% and 14% higher than control; however, only one set of raw grain-yield values was supplied, so the separate 12% result cannot be independently recalculated from the provided information. Plant height at 95 days increased from 69 cm to 73 cm, an absolute difference of 4 cm and a calculated increase of approximately 5.80%, consistent with the rounded 6% source figure. Disease score decreased from 2 to 0, which is a 100% reduction in the recorded score itself. However, the scoring scale, disease identity, incidence measurements, severity criteria, laboratory diagnosis and plant-level disease counts were not supplied, so this page does not generalize the result into complete disease resistance. The supplied location text identifies Village Lani Wala and P.O. Kot Fateh Khan but does not clearly provide the Tehsil name, country, wheat variety, grain-yield unit, sample size, plot dimensions, replication, statistical analysis, fertilizer quantities, pesticide quantities, irrigation volumes, grain quality, production costs, revenue or economic return.

Why this matters for wheat growers: This field comparison reports higher grain yield, taller plants and a lower recorded disease score under Crop Booster treatment while both fields received equal crop inputs. Grain yield increased from 48.14 to 54.7, a calculated improvement of approximately 13.6%.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your wheat or grain operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
University Field Trial · Wheat · Northern India · 2024

28.8% Higher Wheat Yield With 50% Less Water and 10% Less Fertilizer

In a 2024 PBW 826 wheat trial at Lovely Professional University in Panjab, Northern India, the Crop Booster treatment produced 6,976 kg compared with 5,416 kg in the control while using 50% of the reported control water allocation and 90% of the fertilizer.

+28.8%
Wheat Yield · 6,976 kg vs. 5,416 kg
50% Less Water
With 10% Less Fertilizer
Date
2024
Institution
Lovely Professional University
Location
Panjab · Northern India
Crop
Wheat
Variety
PBW 826
Fertilizer
Split Dosages · Dry Application
Irrigation
Flood Irrigation
Irrigations
5 Reported
Replications
3
Plot Matrix
3 × 5 Plots Per Field
Trial Design The source describes a Harvest Harmonics Profitability Optimization Protocol for Sustainability using a 3 × 5 plot matrix in each field, road separation between fields, and three replications.
PBW 826 wheat trial at Lovely Professional University in Northern India using Kyminasi Crop Booster
PBW 826 Wheat Trial · Lovely Professional University · Northern India · 2024
Yield & Input Results

Higher wheat production was recorded while reported water and fertilizer use were reduced.

The Crop Booster treatment produced 6,976 kg compared with 5,416 kg in the control, an absolute increase of 1,560 kg. Based on the supplied raw values, this equals a 28.80% yield increase. Reported water use declined from a 100% control reference to 50%, while fertilizer use declined from 100% to 90%.

+28.8%
Calculated Yield Increase
6,976 kg with Crop Booster vs. 5,416 kg in control.
+1,560kg
Additional Yield
Absolute difference between treatment and control.
−50%
Water Use
Crop Booster use reported at 50% vs. 100% control reference.
−10%
Fertilizer Use
Crop Booster use reported at 90% vs. 100% control reference.

Higher Wheat Yield

The Crop Booster treatment produced 6,976 kg compared with 5,416 kg in the control.

50% Water Reduction

Water use was reported at 50% of the control reference while the Crop Booster treatment produced the higher yield.

10% Less Fertilizer

Fertilizer use was reported at 90% of the control reference, representing a 10% reduction.

Replicated Field Layout

The supplied protocol describes a 3 × 5 plot matrix with three replications and road separation between fields.

Measurement Control Crop Booster Change
Yield 5,416 kg 6,976 kg +1,560 kg · +28.80%
Water Use 100% 50% −50%
Fertilizer Use 100% 90% −10%
Irrigation Type Flood Flood Same Irrigation Type
Number of Irrigations 5 Reported 5 Reported Source Reported
Institution: Lovely Professional University
Location: Panjab · Northern India
Date: 2024
Crop: Wheat
Variety: PBW 826
Fertilizer Application: Split Dosages · Dry
Irrigation: Flood Irrigation
Number of Irrigations: 5
Field Layout: 3 × 5 Plot Matrix in Each Field
Replications: 3
Protocol: Harvest Harmonics Profitability Optimization Protocol for Sustainability

Control Yield: 5,416 kg
Crop Booster Yield: 6,976 kg
Absolute Yield Difference: +1,560 kg
Calculated Yield Increase: +28.80%
Source-Reported Yield Increase: +25%

Control Water Use: 100% Reference
Crop Booster Water Use: 50% Reference
Reported Water Reduction: 50%

Control Fertilizer Use: 100% Reference
Crop Booster Fertilizer Use: 90% Reference
Reported Fertilizer Reduction: 10%
Technology: Kyminasi® Crop Booster™

The supplied wheat trial reports a control yield of 5,416 kg and a Crop Booster yield of 6,976 kg. The absolute difference is 1,560 kg. Calculating the treatment increase relative to the control gives (6,976 − 5,416) ÷ 5,416 × 100 = approximately 28.80%. This does not match the source-reported 25% yield increase. Because the raw measurements are more specific, this page uses the calculated 28.8% result while retaining the original 25% statement here for transparency. The source reports water use as 100% for the control and 50% for the Crop Booster treatment, which represents a 50% reduction. Fertilizer use is reported as 100% in the control and 90% in the Crop Booster treatment, which represents a 10% reduction. These water and fertilizer figures are supplied as percentages rather than physical quantities; no irrigation volume, millimeters of applied water, liters, fertilizer kilograms, nutrient rates or application-by-application records were supplied. The source states that five irrigations were performed and describes a 3 × 5 plot matrix with three replications, but individual plot yields, variance, statistical analysis and replication-level results were not supplied. No grain protein, test weight, moisture, wheat quality, pesticide use, production costs, selling price, revenue or economic-return data were supplied.

Why this matters for wheat growers: This university trial combines higher measured production with lower reported input use. Crop Booster wheat produced 6,976 kg compared with 5,416 kg in the control while the supplied trial data reports 50% lower water use and 10% lower fertilizer use.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your wheat or grain operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here
Pre-Harvest Field Case · Triticale Wheat · Tlaxcala, Mexico · 2019–2020

15–20% Higher Triticale Wheat Yield Estimated Before Harvest

At Rancho Santa Clara in Tlaxcala, Mexico, Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™ was installed on a triticale wheat crop alongside an untreated comparison plot. Before harvest, the treated field was visually reported to have darker green foliage and denser plant growth, with an estimated 15–20% yield advantage.

15–20%
Pre-Harvest Yield Increase Estimate · Source Reported
Denser Growth
Visual Field Observation
Period
November 2019 – March 2020
Season
Fall – Winter
Farm
Rancho Santa Clara
Location
Tlaxcala, Mexico
Farm Size
250 Hectares · 625 Acres
Crop
Triticale Wheat
Comparison
Crop Booster vs. Untreated Plot
Harvest
Expected Early March
Yield Estimate
+15–20% · Pre-Harvest
Technology
Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™
Farm Context Rancho Santa Clara is described as a 250-hectare farm producing corn, barley and triticale wheat. The farm owner is an agronomist and planned soil, nutrient and production-yield testing following the field observations.
Triticale wheat comparison at Rancho Santa Clara in Tlaxcala Mexico using Kyminasi Plants Crop Booster
Triticale Wheat Comparison · Rancho Santa Clara · Tlaxcala, Mexico
Pre-Harvest Field Observations

Treated wheat appeared darker green and denser before the planned March harvest.

Prior to harvest, the Crop Booster-treated triticale wheat was visually described as much darker green and substantially denser than the untreated comparison plot. Based on these field observations, the source estimated a 15–20% yield increase. Final harvested yield measurements were not included in the supplied case.

15–20%
Estimated Yield Increase
Pre-harvest estimate rather than a measured final yield result.
250ha
Farm Size
Rancho Santa Clara was reported as approximately 625 acres.
Denser
Plant Growth
Crop Booster wheat was visually reported as denser than control.
Darker Green
Foliage
Visual observation compared with the untreated plot.

Darker Green Foliage

The Crop Booster-treated field was visually described as much darker green than the untreated comparison plot.

Denser Plant Growth

Treated triticale wheat was reported to have visibly denser plant growth before harvest.

Yield Increase Was an Estimate

The supplied case estimated 15–20% higher yield based on pre-harvest field observations. Final harvested production was not supplied.

Additional Testing Was Planned

The farm owner planned soil testing, nutrient testing and production-yield calculations, but those results were not included in the supplied material.

Parameter Untreated Control Crop Booster Reported Difference
Foliage Color Lighter by Comparison Much Darker Green Visual Observation
Plant Density / Growth Less Dense by Comparison Denser Visual Observation
Expected Yield Comparison Baseline Estimated Higher +15–20% · Estimated
Final Harvested Yield Not Supplied Not Supplied Cannot Calculate
Chlorophyll Measurement Not Supplied Not Supplied Color Observation Only
Farm: Rancho Santa Clara
Location: Tlaxcala, Mexico
Trial Period: November 2019 – March 2020
Season: Fall – Winter
Farm Size: 250 Hectares · Approximately 625 Acres
Farm Crops: Corn · Barley · Triticale Wheat
Trial Crop: Triticale Wheat
Comparison: Crop Booster Treatment vs. Untreated Plot
Foliage Observation: Treated Wheat Reported as Much Darker Green
Growth Observation: Treated Wheat Reported as Denser
Estimated Yield Increase: +15–20%
Final Harvest: Expected in Early March
Planned Testing: Soil Tests · Nutrient Tests · Production Yield Calculations
Technology: Kyminasi® Plants Crop Booster™

The supplied case describes a pre-harvest comparison between Crop Booster-treated triticale wheat and an untreated plot at Rancho Santa Clara in Tlaxcala, Mexico. The treated field was visually reported as much darker green and denser than the control. The original source states that darker green foliage indicated greater chlorophyll and better plant health, but no SPAD, chlorophyll concentration, NDVI, tissue analysis or other plant-health measurements were supplied. For that reason, this page presents darker green foliage only as a visual field observation. Likewise, the source states that denser growth indicated higher yield by weight, but no harvested production data were supplied at the time of the report. The stated 15–20% yield increase was explicitly an estimate before harvest and should not be interpreted as a measured final yield result. Harvest was expected in early March, and the farm owner planned soil, nutrient and production-yield testing, but no results from those tests were included in the supplied material. No plant population counts, biomass measurements, grain yield, grain weight, protein, test weight, fertilizer-use comparison, pesticide-use comparison, irrigation volume, production costs, revenue or economic-return data were supplied.

Why this matters for wheat growers: This Tlaxcala field case documents visible differences in triticale wheat growth before harvest, including darker green foliage and denser plant development in the Crop Booster-treated area. The source estimated a 15–20% yield advantage, but final harvested yield data would be required to confirm that estimate.

Want to learn more about Harvest Harmonics technology or discuss your wheat or grain operation with our team?

For Booking or Quotes Click Here